-
Website
http://cdharrison.com -
Original page
http://cdharrison.com/2007/03/12/have-i-mentioned-i-hate-outlook-2007/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Daniel Ha
1 comment · 405 points
-
Montgomery
3 comments · 2 points
-
Jay Neely: Boston entrepreneur
1 comment · 1 points
-
jeffmastro
2 comments · 1 points
-
Colin Devroe
1 comment · 6 points
-
-
Popular Threads
I'll be stuck with Outlook so long as I'm tied to an Exchange server, but it won't be Outlook 2007, at least not in it's current form. The nicest thing I can say about it is I'm sure some other application sucks worse.
Developers of Outlook, Hello, NOT ALL MAIL RECIPIENTS HAVE 'CALIBRI'.
One example:
Open Outlook
Open Calendar, set to full week view
Open task manager so you can watch the Processor usage of the Outlook process.
MOUSE OVER the calendar and watch processor usage leap to 20%, even 50%. On a 3ghz P4 with HT turned on.
No biggie if the system isn't doing anything, but if anything else is stressing the proc a bit, outlook drags the whole system to its knees. 2003 didn't do this.
We noticed this on a variety of machines within 20 minutes of updating. Where is MS Quality Control? Testing? Anyone?
I can't help but feel like I'm having to pay for the privilege of beta-testing this abomination for Microsoft.
The performance problems I see (excluding reading from Exchange stores and PST issues) were there then and worse. So while it has improved it certainly hasn't been fixed in any way. So much for the usefulness of Beta.
Have you considered getting a Mac? :)
Word 2007 however makes me feel as autistic as you apparently.
Anyway, better get used to it I guess!
They continued experiencing delays when opening the messages. The complete trouble was the with users that need work with cross-referenced correspondence and need to re-open old messages, then need to open new and so on. And each such opening caused the delay. At last, Microsoft released the update that patches the mspst32.dll library and the Outlook.exe. I installed it on several computers that I control on my own because it they are just a few steps away from my workplace. But I have no clue how to manage that now! How can I install this patch for other users? I know that's possible to do that via GPO and assign the patch to the specified user group. But the bad thing is that it doesn't work for me. I have to setup it exclusively and to check more parameters of the user environment. Not all our users use Outlook 2007 and what's more problematic, not all experience the trouble. And the gold rule: if it works, don't patch it. I need your expertise. How to manage their desktops? Currently what I got from googling is the link to the software that supposedly can arrange desktop management and execute patching after checking the user environment properties. I haven't worked with such tools before. If you have an experience, would you please review the link and say what you think?
By the way with that 'data file was closed improperly’ message you recieve, try checking if you use Word as the default editor for creating your messages. It looks like if you have opened both your Outlook with opened message that you are writing and the Word where you type your document separately from what you are typing in your Outlook, the winword.exe and outlook.exe images will not be closed when you will close applications. Then, if you will terminate the Outlook process, you will get this 'data file was closed improperly’ message when you will start the Outlook application again.
Well, misery definitely likes company. My girlfriend is sure that I have set a Guinness World Record for longest string of profanity uttered without causing spontaneous human combustion.
I cannot believe that Microsoft can dump this concoction of rotting snake bile on the planet with complete immunity. I think the EULA that Bill Gates hides behind while counting his quadrillion dollars in his snotty little hands, should be ruled illegal by SOME court SOMEWHERE!
No other industry has been allowed to dump their product on the general public and not be held accountable for the carnage left behind. If a car manufacturer put a new model on the market in which 90% of them came to a grinding halt in traffic for no apparent reason, or had a dashlight that once a week flashed "Go back to your car dealer and pick up a box of new parts to replace the defective parts that came with your car. This car will not start until you do", there would be public insurrection.
....oh...wait! I've calmed down a bit....Thanks for letting me vent.
bye
Randy
As for my own computer, I've stuck with Office XP since 2002.
Jane, I totally agree with the way you feel. I've been able to use Windows Classic theme to escape the offensive shininess until today. Now it feels like my senses are under assault. There's just way too much useless distractions... the glare is blinding.
I've tried customizations to make things as efficient, categorized, accessible, and color-coded as they were, but to no avail. I can't work or even think.
When it seems like I'm getting used to it, I notice some action now takes twice as long to process as it did before and my blood begins to boil. Opening messages, browsing my calendar, even moving my mouse past vast useless expanses of Ribbon seems to take forever. Not to mention the "Desktop Search" that now takes 2 hours to index my email for quick search, where before using the 3rd party tool Lookout took only 10 minutes.
I talked to tech support about rolling back, but they denied my request. I've even considered quitting my job. I hope it doesn't come to that.
Opening a link from within the app takes 30 seconds. A link. In an email. Which opens a browser. OL2003 on my old PIII 766 at home takes 10 seconds. And it can barely run Windows.
Between Vista and OL2007 I am pretty much ready to switch OSes.
I bought three new home computers this year. All of them with XP and OL 2003. And I'm perfectly happy.
Brave new world, where art thou?
Thing is I still want the 2007 version of Powerpoint...... I wanted to do a custom install of Office 2007 originally, installing only Powerpoint, but it wouldn't let me. So. Do you think it would be possible, to go to add/remove programs, choose change, and delete everything from Office 2007, BUT for Powerpoint. Then install Office 2003, choosing to ONLY install Word and Outlook (as that's all i want) from Office 2003, and still end up with my Powerpoint 2007???? I'd appreciate any opinions or feedback about my idea before I go ahead and try it. I might be just dreamin here, but, it seems to make logical sense to me, lol.
thanks in advance.
Also, the stupid paragraph mark and proofreading characters appear when I am composing an e-mail. Yes, I have it turned off in Word, Style, toolbar, etc. It keeps coming back and this program will change styles on me and revert to displaying it.
It is running on XP. There were no problems for four months then, it started. Our ISP put everyone they serve into a group at Google mail. Maybe there is a different way to configure our set up because of that.
I send out a news letter each month, in HTML, and people can't see it. If anyone has any ideas, they would be welcome. Setting up a new profile was impossible because of loosing all my contacts. I am not enough of a techie to reconfigure (and I shouldn't have to) my contacts, etc. after changing profiles.
While I am at it. Why doesn't Microsoft have updated directions. If you are looking for direction in Outlook 2007 there is a step that is skipped or the function is called by another name. That burns me up. If I pay for Microsoft 2007, I want the directions to be for it not another program!
Thanks, I feel better but, my problems are not solved. Waiting for the other shoe to drop......
Some very basic things have been shuffled about and recategorized and what once took 1 click now takes 3. And so on and so forth.
It's called QA microsoft, you might want to investigate some best practices.
It is quite the swine on resources as well.
Downgrade time.
I doubt I'll have DST problems as I don't sync anything with online calendars, so when DST comes around, I'll be happy the times are updated.
Performance wise, this runs great. There was no performance drop in 2003 in the slightest. There has been no data corruption, no long loading times, no massive CPU or disk usage at all. I watched my CPU usage while running it and playing with the calendar, mail, etc. The highest jump I saw was 8% with an average of 2%, and most of that is probably system and background apps! Someone else was complaining about clicking links and having them open in a browser taking 30 seconds. In actuality, it so quick it's almost instant. If the browser isn't running currently, then yes, it takes approximately 0.5 seconds. You must be running on a 200 MHz Celeron or something. My machine is ok, a core 2 duo @ 2.4 GHz with 4 GB of ram, nothing too high end or special.
As for internet calendars, who cares. It's called Exchange server, and it works like a charm. If you're wanting email in a non-corporate setting, use something like Thunderbird. That's what I use at home, and I love it.
Otherwise, I love Outlook 07. Overlaying calendars on top of each other is a great feature, and the calendar views seem cleaner to me. Tasks are much more improved, especially how they line up in your calendar view so everything is integrated together. The built in viewers for office docs, text, and images right within messages are great.
I honestly have not run into a single issue after upgrading Office to 07, and will never go back. It's an update well worth doing.
(For the record, I was using it on machine with a 3.0 Ghz Pentium 4 HT with 3Gb RAM and a 256Mb video card.)
I can work with manipulations on 20MB images in Photoshop more quickly and efficiently than I can performa basic email tasks. It's not the hardware.
With a product that doesn't have flaws we should be seeing one person who's having problems among dozens for whom the app works flawlessly, not the other way around.
Telling people to use Thunderbird is missing the point - why can MS not deliver a product that works for a large part of their market, corporate or otherwise, better than a free app?